The calculation many plants skip
When people talk about the maintenance cost of an agitator, they often only think about the price of the spare part. But the mechanical seal itself —critical as it is— usually represents a small share of the real cost of an intervention.
The big cost, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘂𝗽 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗰e, is everything around the change: labor hours, lifting equipment, safety permits and, above all, the time the line stays down.
𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 to understanding why it’s worth rethinking how the seal is accessed.
The four costs to add up (and the ones most often overlooked)
To get a real picture of an intervention’s cost, it needs to be broken down into four blocks:
𝟭. 𝗟𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁
It’s not just the hour spent changing the part. You need to count preparation (permits, lockout, cleaning), prior dismantling of the drive, gearbox and motor, the intervention itself, and reassembly with the corresponding verification. Multiplied by the hourly cost of maintenance staff —in-house or outsourced— the figure adds up fast.
𝟮. 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝘂𝘅𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀
Overhead crane, hoist, forklift. If rented, they have a direct cost; if internal, they carry an opportunity and coordination cost. And if the lifting operation is carried out by an external operator, their hours need to be added too.
𝟯. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 (𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲)
Entering a tank is never a formality: it involves an external safety watchman, ventilation and gas-detection equipment, documentation and work permits, and prior cleaning of the tank. It’s also one of the points with the greatest impact on safety.
𝟰. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁
This is usually the largest of all. It’s calculated by multiplying the hourly output of the affected line (€/h or kg/h × price), or by applying the plant’s fixed cost per hour of downtime. The four costs to add up (and the ones most often overlooked)
Where to get this data?
The best source is your own records. There’s no need for absolute precision: even an approximate range such as «between 4 and 8 fewer hours of intervention» or «no crane needed in 90% of cases» will give you the argument.
The solution: reaching the seal without touching the drive
Once the cost breakdown is clear, the next question is obvious: what would happen if one of these four blocks could be reduced or eliminated?
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻. Instead of accessing it from above —which, in a conventional configuration, often requires dismantling parts of the drive or other agitator components—, the lateral design allows direct access to the seal from outside the equipment.
Watch step by step, how to change a mechanical seal with lateral mounting
This has a knock-on effect on all four costs above:
𝟭. 𝗡𝗼 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲. This is probably the strongest argument of all. If there’s no need to remove the motor, gearbox or drive assembly, working hours are saved, the risk of subsequent misalignment is reduced, and handling heavy components is avoided.
𝟮. 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱. Since the drive doesn’t need to be dismantled, the need for an overhead crane, hoist or forklift is typically reduced or eliminated. Less preparation, less coordination, less external or internal cost.
𝟯. 𝗡𝗼 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀. Avoiding entry into the tank reduces work permits, external watch duty, ventilation, lockout and prior cleaning. It’s both an economic saving and a clear safety improvement.
𝟰. 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲. Because the change is more accessible and requires fewer operations, the machine stays down for less time. For many customers, this ends up being the most important saving of all.
In short: lateral mounting reduces the total cost of an intervention because it allows access to the seal without dismantling the drive, minimizing maintenance hours, lifting equipment, confined-space risks and production downtime.
𝘈 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵: 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺, 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺.
How much can be saved per intervention?
Applying the cost breakdown above to a lateral configuration versus a conventional one, the saving per intervention typically falls 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝟯,𝟬𝟬𝟬€ 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝟭𝟱,𝟬𝟬𝟬€, depending on the hourly maintenance cost, the need for lifting equipment, the plant’s safety requirements and the cost of production downtime.
In an average scenario, the reasonable saving for each mechanical seal change is estimated at around 𝟲,𝟬𝟬𝟬–𝟴,𝟬𝟬𝟬€ 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, mainly due to:
- Fewer maintenance hours
- Elimination or reduction of drive dismantling
- Lower need for lifting equipment
- Reduction of confined-space-related work
- Less production downtime
With these figures on the table, the apparent higher upfront cost of a lateral mounting solution comes into perspective: 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, especially for critical equipment or processes with a high cost of downtime.
The practical takeaway
The cost of a mechanical seal should never be assessed in isolation. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 is the total cost of the intervention over the equipment’s 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 —and here, design accessibility weighs as much as, or more than, the price of the component.
Running this calculation, even with approximate figures, is the first step towards 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱.
Do not hesitate contacting our specialists for further information! vakkimsa.com
